Live from New York's U.N. Theatre - The Devil and the Dancing Dictators
Sunday, 07.01.2007, 03:15pm (GMT)
Iran’s Prime Minister Mahmoud Ahmadinejad addressing the UN said things
that betray his ignorance of protocol, truthfulness and history. In one
breath he said “I respect the Jews” but made no effort to explain his
previous cry to wipe them off the map. In a typically uninformed world
view he asked why the Palestinians were not allowed to determine their
own fate as it pertains to their own ancient homeland. Prior to 1948
Palestinians never used the phrase “homeland” and were not looking for
one even in the remotest sense of the word.
His contorted view of history ignores a 4000 year long history of
Jewish ownership of Israel as do almost all Muslims around the world.
This view gives new meaning to the cliché “don’t confuse me with the
facts.” But here is a dictator who doesn’t believe there was ever a
holocaust. For all of the faults of the Third Reich poor record keeping
was not one of them. The holocaust is without exception the most well
documented slaughter in history. One could say it may be easier to
document the holocaust than to document Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. This
dictator leaves credulity blowing in the wind and makes anyone wonder
how he ever came to power. Perhaps ranting is all that’s needed to take
power in Iran. The bottom line is that this is not the kind of man that
needs to have a nuclear arsenal at his disposal by any stretch of the
imagination.
Next is Hugo Chavez to the UN floor with name calling and metaphoric
reference to odors of burning sulfur left behind by the recent visit of
President George Bush. Chavez may see himself as the modern counterpart
of South America’s most renowned statesmen Simon Bolivar but that
comparison resides only in the mind of Mr. Chavez. Not even his own
countrymen would dare to stretch things that far.
Venezuela may not see baseball the way Americans do but there is
something in that game that seems all too well suited for Mr. Chavez,
namely “three strikes and your out.” What were those three strikes?
Let’s examine each briefly.
The first strike against Mr. Chavez came as a result of his complete
and utter abandonment of gentility, propriety, respect and protocol. To
blast the leaders of a host country unashamedly while enjoying every
courtesy and advantage available to him as a visiting statesman is pure
unbridled indecency. That President Bush did not respond in kind or at
all only gave greater honor to the presidency and Mr. Bush. The rest of
us would have liked to give Mr. Chavez the bums rush, with the
exception of Danny Glover. Perhaps for Glover and Chavez that liaison
might be their version of “Dancing with the Stars.”
The second strike came when Chavez decided to take to the neighborhood
church and from a pulpit cover his lack of refinement with offers of
help for America’s poor. Oh please.
Spreading around some cheap oil is only a cheap trick in disguise.
Let’s not forget that spreading money and benevolence around the
neighborhood is not a new idea in the quest for followers and
adherents. Jim Jones paid peoples mortgages, rent and bills but in the
end fed them poison cool aid. Hezbollah helps people all over Lebanon
with the hope that this once proud and independent country will not
bite the hand that feeds them even while the other hand is lobbing
bombs at Lebanon’s neighbors. Al Capone and other mobsters were sure to
give favors to the immigrants and neighborhoods in various cities at
the same time they bred corruption and murder at will. Let’s throw in
the drug cartels of Columbia who are well known for dumping multi
millions of dollars around that nation to gain an army of silent but
compatriot ally’s among the common people. Some have called it a
political stunt but regardless of what its called…that’s strike two.
To see how Chavez made strike three requires a little knowledge of the
Bible. Even as Chavez was blessing himself with the (catholic) sign of
the cross he repeatedly called President Bush the devil. Perhaps Mr.
Chavez could find an excuse in the fact that Catholicism depends more
on ex-cathedra and patristic teachings rather than the Bible. Maybe it
is the fault of those who taught Mr. Chavez his brand of Christianity.
In any case even while he invoked God by the sign of the cross he was
committing what the Bible calls the one and only unforgivable sin,
blasphemy of the Spirit.
To say that the spirit that is in a man and from which he gets his
inspiration and unction is the Devil when it is in fact Gods Spirit is
blasphemy according to scripture. See Matthew 12: 31-32 If Mr. Chavez
did this ignorantly or not is for God alone to judge but either way Mr.
Chavez is stuck with either the guilt of blasphemy or the guilt of
wholesale ignorance. Strike three, your out.
Volumes could be written on the two dancing dictators but suffice it to
say less may be more. Taking a cue from President George Bush we won’t
go any further than to say these boys may be able to dance to the
applause of the UN but they couldn’t make it through the national
anthem in a simple game of baseball
|