The Royal Furnitures and Their History
Sunday, 07.01.2007, 02:57pm (GMT)
Sometime the emergence of new designs could coincide with that of the
personal designs of the rulers like that of King Louis XVI. The variety
in tastes of the patrons sometimes gives birth to new designs. The
non-accessibility of these furniture gives ways to fake products of the
original because sometime the prices of the original were not
affordable for everyone to possess them. But sometimes it is very
difficult to identify the name of the makers.
Louis XVI
A style that coincided roughly with the reign of this king: 1774 to
1793, and that is associated with a predominance of straight lines in
place of curves. Tables and cabinets usually had square instead of
rounded corners, and legs were square or rounded in place of cabriole.
Furniture continued to be veneered and fitted with ormolu mounts, and
many pieces were decorated with plaques of Sevres porcelain; some of it
in blue and white to imitate Wedgwood ware. There was a revival of
interest in Boulle work, more of this was made to fill the demand, and
it can be distinguished only with difficulty from that made earlier.
Chairs no longer had the cabriole leg, but usually oval backs and
turned legs; in both this and the preceding period they were often
upholstered in tapestry.
Empire
Following the luxurious tastes of the eighteenth century, there was a
revival of comparative austerity when the excesses of the Revolution
finally died away. Instead of the richly mounted and colorful
marquetry, the fashion was for plain mahogany with perhaps an inlay of
brass and restrained ormolu mounts. The mahogany used was often of a
darker colour and more oven grain than that favored in England, but
there are a number of similarities between the Empire style in France
and the Regency. Chairs, in particular, often had the sabre leg in both
countries. It must be emphasized that old French furniture was costly
when it was made, and has always maintained a high price.
During the past hundred years, those who could not afford the genuine
article bought copies, which were made to sell at reasonable prices
and, apart from these copies, which were not made with intent to
deceive, it has paid the unscrupulous to spend time and money in making
fakes. Remembering the years that have passed since most of it was
made, some two centuries, and the fact that much was destroyed and
damaged during the Revolution, it is surprising that so many fine
examples have survived. A lot of these have been repaired skillfully:
lost veneer replaced, lost tops of tables restored, cupboards converted
into drawers, and so forth. Thus, with French furniture as much as with
any other, the collector must be very cautious indeed, and the subject
needs careful study before its qualities can be appreciated and
assessed.
With English furniture it is rarely possible to name the maker unless
bills or other definite evidence has been preserved. Only very
occasionally is a cabinet-maker's label found pasted inside a piece.
French craftsmen, however, had the custom of marking their productions
(or the majority of them) with a steel stamp bearing their name or
initials. This was followed, when applicable, by a monogram of the
letters J M E, standing for jurande des menuisiers-ebenistes; showing
that the article was up to the standard required by the Corporation of
French cabinet-makers and had been inspected by their appointed jury.
This custom, also, has had the attention of the fakers, and more pieces
bear the alleged stamp of famous craftsmen than they could ever have
had the time to make.
The following is a very brief list of the more eminent French
cabinet-makers of the eighteenth century, of whom there were nearly
1,000 working in 1790:
J. H. Reisener
L. Boudin
Bernard Van Reisen Burgh
P. Russell (Stamped B.V.R.B.)
J. F. Oeben
D. Rontgen
Martin Carlin
C. C. Saunier
Roger Vandercruse Lacroix
A. Weisweiler (Stamped R.V.L.C.)
G. Jacob (Specialized in making chairs)
As you may be aware of the revolution in France and England. These
revolutions had damaged many of the valuable furniture of both the
royal and the common man. But many of the damaged had been skillfully
repaired and restored. And due to the fake ones it is very difficult to
identify the correct craftsmen.
|