Disability Benefits Commission: Town-Hall Meeting After-Action Report
Sunday, 07.01.2007, 02:44pm (GMT)
The Veterans Disability Commission met in St. Petersburg, Florida, in a
Town Hall format to listen to the concerns of the veterans' community.
The meeting was conducted over two days. The entire 15-member
commission was present. The first session began with the chair making
brief remarks explaining the mission and purpose of the commission. The
executive director then explained the process the commission would
undertake to complete its mission.
The main focus of the commission was to listen to the public. The
public-comment session lasted ninety minutes. The hearing room was
packed because the word had reached the veterans' community in the St.
Petersburg-Tampa area. Veterans from across the state also were in
attendance.
In advance of the meeting, Craig Tonjes, the Florida State Council
president, sent a letter to all veterans' organizations, apprising them
of the importance of showing up at the commission sessions. I also
contacted the local VVA chapters to insure that VVA and interested
veterans were in attendance. The early warning worked.
The Town Hall process doesn't leave individuals much time to state a
point of concern. Most presenters didn't have a clear understanding of
the purpose for which the commission was formed and presented remarks
that were not germane. Many of the presenters expressed a feeling that
the commission was created for the purpose of finding ways to reduce or
eliminate benefits.
The chair addressed that perception when he stated that it was not the
intention of the commission to reduce or eliminate benefits. However, I
am not sure the statement convinced anyone in the meeting room.
The statement prepared by David Houppert, VVA's director of Veterans
Benefits, was entered into the record. Craig Tonjes and Tom Hall, the
Florida State Council treasurer, also addressed the commission.
Fewer veterans attended the second session. Yet, some veterans who had
just heard about the commission through the local media showed up. The
structure for the second day was even more restrictive. After opening
remarks, the executive director of the Florida Department of Veterans
Affairs, Col. Rocky McPherson, spoke. He mentioned the concern that the
Veterans Benefits Administration in Bay Pines showed a reduction of
staff in the Regional Office, but he could not provide an explanation.
The new regional office director did not have an explanation, either.
The chief of the Tampa VA Hospital Poly Trauma Rehabilitation Center,
Steven G. Scott, described the workings of the Trauma Center. He went
into great detail about how they care for seriously injured service
members. The process of analysis and evaluation of injuries covering
all aspects from initial diagnosis to secondary and tertiary issues,
including the issue of pain, was explored. Commission members asked
about the relationship between pain and rating for disability purposes.
Donald Ivers, the former Regional Office Director in St. Petersburg,
explained the theory used by the VA to incorporate the issue of pain
into current ratings. The issue of PTSD versus blast syndrome was
discussed since many of the symptoms are similar for each and could be
misdiagnosed.
The public comment period was even shorter than it was the previous
evening. It was during that session that I presented a brief version of
my prepared testimony. Also in attendance at the morning session was
the former Director of the St. Petersburg VA Regional Office, Donald
Ivers, and the former Under Secretary for Veterans Benefits, John Vogel.
The commission will visit seven additional areas of the country.
Preparation prior to appearing before the commission is very important.
Since each individual only has five minutes to speak, targeted brief
remarks are needed.
Issues should be broken up into individual, short presentations so more
territory can be covered. This will require more VVA members to attend
these meetings. Turnout is important.
During the evening session, I had a chance meeting with one of the
commission staff members, a friend of almost 20 years, Jackie Garrick.
She is a veteran, a social worker, and previously she worked for the
American Legion. Garrick mentioned that she would attend the commission
hearings in Boston and Chicago.
I also had an opportunity to talk with Joe Wynn, a member of the
commission. Craig Tonjes, Tom Hall, and I also spoke to Butch Joeckel,
another commission member.
Many questions persist, and we still don't know for sure what
recommendations will be made to the President and Congress. The
overbearing presence of VA personnel and the reliance on the IOM and
the Center for Naval Analysis make me nervous. So does the number of
high-ranking retired military officers.
|