Free In America: Fact or Fiction?
Sunday, 07.01.2007, 02:40pm (GMT)
The recent debate over illegal immigration in America has generated a
lot of talk about freedom. Political pundits have taken center stage on
nightly news programs to champion reasons for and against why illegal
immigrants should enjoy the same freedoms generations of Americans have
fought to ensure. But all this talk about freedom has failed to raise
one crucial question: are we, citizens of what many consider the freest
nation on earth, really as free as we think we are? The short answer,
of course, is yes. The Constitution guarantees certain freedoms, such
as those of assembly and speech. The long answer, however, is more
complicated.
Like most things worthwhile, real, authentic freedom requires work. At
its most basic level, freedom requires us to make choices. But it also
endows us with a civic duty, the duty to learn and examine as much as
we can about issues which affect us so that we make the best choices
possible. In order to make sound choices, however, we must have
information, factual, uncensored information that examines and exposes
all sides of an issue. Simply put, freedom of the mind promotes
creativity in thinking. Citizens who do not access or do not have
access to all aspects of a given issue or situation do not have full
choice about what they come to understand about the issue or situation.
So while they may be free in theory, in reality, they are not unlike
slaves, forfeiting their right to ask questions and receive truthful
answers about current issues and ideas, opting, instead, to view issues
and ideas through the lens of the nation's power and information
brokers.
Consider the issue of Iraq. The now four-year old occupation of the
tiny Middle Eastern country is fodder for nightly newscasts, but if one
were to ask most Americans the reason for this occupation, their
answers would, at the very least, be full of factual inaccuracies
(wrong names and dates, for example). Very likely, their answers would
reveal an undercurrent of suspicion linking all Iraqis and other Middle
Easterners to terrorists. But is this any surprise, considering the
words and pictures, the textual imagery, through which Iraq and the War
on Terror are covered in the news media?
From the very beginning of the conflict, the media have portrayed Iraq
and its people as barbarians and terrorists, perpetrators of 9-11 who
harbored weapons of mass destruction; as rogues desperately in need of
liberation and democratization. Even after United Nations inspectors
failed to find any evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, the
media and current American administration continued to present that
country in such negative, uni-dimensional light. The Administration
even went so far as to frequently issue color-coded terrorist alerts to
warn Americans of impending danger; these warnings were often issued
without any discussion about the reasons for the alert. The only thing
the warnings did was to strike fear in American citizens, perpetuating
the negative textual imagery of Iraq and its people.
What was missing from this onslaught of media images were the voices of
innocent Iraqis, pictures of the suffering, video montages of lives
blown apart at the seams by a war many now believe was senseless. As an
Iraqi who visited my country after the war's outbreak, and as one who
witnessed firsthand the needless suffering and loss of so many,
including my own family, I can't help but wonder if Americans would
ever have supported the invasion had they been given a chance to hear
the voices at the center of the conflict? Would they have challenged
some of the legislation spawned by the War, such as passage of the
Patriot Act and subsequent intrusions into telephone and library
records it allows? Would they have demanded that the nation's power
brokers be accountable for upholding the freedoms that more than
two-thousand United States G.I.'s have so far shed their blood to
protect?
I think so. After all, it is the license to question and debate, to
expect truthful answers from those in authority, and to choose those
paths one feels would be most beneficial, that prompted America's
forebears to call this the "land of the free." As citizens of this
land, we wouldn't be earning our keep, or performing our civic duty, if
we exercised anything less than this basic freedom.
|